Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fork xla::ExecuteOptions into xla::ifrt::ExecuteOptions #17725

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

@copybara-service copybara-service bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Fork xla::ExecuteOptions into xla::ifrt::ExecuteOptions

Only the fields that are currently being used by any IFRT implementation are copied to the fork. Two fields that are currently being used as a passthrough in PjRt-IFRT but are removed are:

  • untuple_result: Since IFRT does not have XLA tuple types, all PjRt-IFRT invocations must have already been setting this to true. So this CL changes PjRt-IFRT to unconditionally set untuple_result to true when invoking PjRt and gets rid of this field from xla.ifrt.ExecuteOptions.
  • use_major_to_minor_data_layout_for_callbacks: The meaning of this field is very specific to PjRt. Since this field is set to true in every IFRT invocation that cares about this field, this CL instead changes PjRt-IFRT to internally always set this field to true and avoid exposing this to IFRT.

In order to not break the IFRT Proxy's version compatibility, the forked ExecuteOptionsProto uses the same field tags as the original proto.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants